For years, QLC NAND has been the budget-friendly option in the SSD world: high-capacity, low-cost, and predictably slower than TLC or SLC when it comes to write performance. With its new 2600 NVMe SSD, Micron is making the case that QLC can now go toe-to-toe with TLC, at least where it matters for OEMs and high-volume client systems.

At the core of this performance leap is Adaptive Write Technology (AWT), a firmware-level optimization designed to overcome the traditional limitations of QLC. Combined with Micron's ninth-generation (G9) QLC NAND, which is the company’s fastest and densest NAND to date, AWT gives the 2600 SSD enough write horsepower to outperform even value TLC drives in key benchmarks.

Write Speed Reimagined

To understand what Micron is solving with AWT, it's worth looking at what makes QLC different. Compared to TLC (three bits per cell), QLC (four bits per cell) packs more data into the same physical space. That extra bit, however, comes at the cost of slower program and erase speeds and lower endurance.

Most QLC SSDs use a small static SLC cache to mask this write penalty. But once the cache fills (typically just a few percent of total capacity), write speeds drop dramatically. That makes traditional QLC SSDs a poor fit for scenarios involving large file transfers, OS imaging, or frequent data writes, such as video production, software development, and game installations.

AWT: Dynamic Caching on the Fly

Micron's Adaptive Write Technology rethinks how caching is handled. Instead of a fixed SLC region, AWT enables the SSD to write data in SLC, TLC, or QLC modes dynamically, based on workload, available space, and drive state. It continuously monitors how the SSD is used and resizes write regions accordingly.

When a large chunk of data is written, such as a 400-GB OS image or a batch of 4K video files, AWT writes it first in SLC mode for maximum speed. As that region fills, the system switches to TLC-mode writing. Only when both faster regions fill does AWT move data to native QLC storage, doing so during idle time to avoid blocking active processes.

Micron claims that AWT can quadruple sequential write speeds compared to standard QLC behavior, for up to 40% of the SSD's rated capacity. In a 1-TB drive, that means writing 400 GB of data at close to TLC performance before hitting any slowdown.

What’s New With G9 NAND?

AWT wouldn't be as effective without hardware fast enough to take advantage of it. That’s where Micron’s G9 NAND enters the picture. Built on the company’s latest 3D QLC architecture, G9 NAND achieves a 3.6-GB/s I/O transfer rate—the fastest currently shipping in a client SSD.

The secret is a six-plane architecture that boosts parallelism. More planes mean more independent read and write operations can occur simultaneously. For real-world workloads, this translates to faster access to random and sequential data alike.

QLC NAND

G9 also brings a 28% smaller package footprint (11.5 mm x 13.5 mm) compared to competitive NAND options. That’s especially important in space-constrained designs like thin-and-light laptops or handheld gaming consoles, where storage real estate is limited.

Benchmarks back up Micron’s claims. In PCMark 10 Full System Drive tests, the 2600 SSD delivered:

* Up to 63% faster sequential writes than competing value TLC and QLC SSDs

* 49% faster random writes

* 37–44% higher PCMark 10 scores depending on the benchmark suite used

That performance profile positions the 2600 SSD to displace TLC in client systems that were previously too demanding for QLC. It also benefits OEMs building machines for AI workloads, content creation, and software development, all of which rely heavily on fast, sustained write throughput.

Why This Matters

Ultimately, Micron is delivering more than just a faster QLC SSD. It’s trying to shift the narrative around QLC entirely. With Adaptive Write Technology, the 2600 SSD no longer behaves like a low-tier drive under heavy use. For engineers, this opens up new options in system design, like higher capacities at TLC-like performance levels and simplified part sourcing with one SSD family covering multiple performance and physical profiles.

AWT isn’t magic. It doesn’t eliminate QLC’s inherent limitations. But it does get much closer to bridging the gap in practical terms. For system builders and embedded designers, that could be the difference between tolerating QLC and actually preferring it.

By: DocMemory
Copyright © 2023 CST, Inc. All Rights Reserved